Gerry McGovern logoNew Thinking by Gerry McGovern: web content managementNew Thinking logo: Gerry McGovern

Website content management solutions
  Home  I  About  I  Solutions  I  Clients  I  Contact
Blank Blank Blank Blank Blank


 
New Thinking Home

  Subject Classification
  Reader Feedback
  Subscribing
  Unsubscribing
  2006
  2005
  2004
  2003
  2002
  2001
  2000 
  1999 
  1998 
  1997
  1996



Books by
Gerry McGovern

Content Critical
Content Critical book cover
Gaining competitive advantage through high-quality web content



The Web Content
Style Guide

The Web Content Style Guide book cover
The essential guide
for online writers, editors and managers

 
October 27, 2003

Should you centralize or decentralize your publishing?

By Gerry McGovern

Large websites often struggle to develop an efficient and cost-effective publishing model. Centralizing publishing ensures a consistent quality of what is published, but is often slow and frustrating. Decentralized publishing is faster and often more cost-effective, but can result in inconsistent quality, unless rigorous publishing standards are adhered to.

There is a definite trend towards the centralization of information architecture: metadata and classification design, navigation, search, layout and graphic design. Because the Web is inherently a navigational space, readers like a consistent architecture. Of course, adhering to standard templates is also more cost-effective, faster to implement, and easier to manage.

There is less consensus on what sort of publishing process to implement. The centralized model tends to work well where the organization does not have extensive publishing expertise. Many organizations simply do not have a history of publishing.

Sometimes, staff don't have the skills or the interest in publishing content, whether to the intranet or public website. Often, such organizations don't have all that much to publish on an ongoing basis. Thus, a centralized model can work well, where a small central team coordinates and publishes content for the entire organization.

One area of particular debate is in relation to metadata. Some believe that trained librarians (or similar professionals) should be responsible for the input of metadata. I believe that metadata needs to be as decentralized as possible. In fact, it needs to become core to the writing process. (But that's for another issue.)

Centralized publishing is, by definition, restrictive. The publishing workflow tends to be slower and more convoluted. Sometimes, centralized publishing can be simply too restrictive. "Since the centralized group has tried to take over, it's all going South in a hand basket," Gail Bennett, who works for a major corporation, told me in an email recently.

"They want full control for editing which makes no sense," Gail continues. "Instead of me changing one report link which takes about 30 seconds, I'm supposed to gather and send all the info up the road to sit in a huge priority waiting list. By the time they get to our edits weeks later, they're already outdated!"

Such a situation is by no means uncommon. Where content needs to be published quickly, the central team often becomes a bottleneck. However, it's not simply a matter of allowing a publish-at-will approach. Allowing everyone to publish whatever they want whenever they want is a recipe for disaster.

So, if you feel you need to decentralize, you must put in place proper structures. These include:
  • A style guide: This should cover style and tone, usage, glossary and references. Too many organizations create style guides and then never adhere to them. This is counter-productive.
  • A publishing policy: You need to establish policies that deal with scheduling and commissioning, metadata and classification, editing and removal of old content, promotion, legal issues, etc.
  • Publishing measurables: If you're going to allow people to publish they must be measured on what they publish. It's as simple as that.
  • Training and evangelism: Quality publishing is a complex task requiring skill and experience. Few organizations have reached a level of sufficient competence. To upgrade skills, extensive training programs will be required. Before such training is initiated, staff need to be evangelized on the importance of getting publishing right.

Gerry McGovern
 

Content management banner ad

Related articles

Publishing content

Publishing team

Next issue: Content management: web publishing needs real discipline
Previous issue: Why personalization hasn't worked

New Thinking homepage
 

 

Line
"Gerry's insight into quality web content has become a standard by which we are building our next generation web presence and developing our content style guide."
Tom Beddingfield - Manager, Global Web Presence, Schlumberger


More client feedback

Information on upcoming content management seminars and workshops


New Thinking Newsletter
Subscribe to this free weekly newsletter covering the role and function of content on the Web.
More info | Privacy policy
Read the current issue



Email Address:

Subscribe Unsubscribe



If you're going to allow people to publish they must be measured on what they publish.

 

 

Selected clients

Lloyds TSB logo

IONA logo

HP logo

Richemont logo

Novartis logo

Software AG logo

Schlumberger logo

Department of Transport logo

Find out more about Gerry McGovern's clients

 


 

     

Line

Home - About - Solutions - Clients - Contact - Search

Tel: +353 87 238 6136
Email: brian@gerrymcgovern.com

Privacy Policy

Copyright © Gerry McGovern. All rights reserved.