|
New Thinking Home
Subject Classification Reader Feedback
Subscribing
Unsubscribing 2006
2005 2004 2003
2002
2001 2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
Books by
Gerry McGovern
Content Critical

Gaining competitive advantage through high-quality web content
The Web
Content
Style Guide

The essential guide
for online writers, editors and managers
|
|
August 11, 2003
The evolution of large websites
By Gerry McGovern
If you're part of a large organization, your website will probably have
been started by a small group of evangelists. It will have grown in a very
ad hoc manner. Gradually, senior management will have become more involved.
Finally, the website will have been viewed as just another business tool,
and managed as such.
Large websites have the following basic lifecycle:
-
Early development by evangelists
-
Rapid and enthusiastic growth
-
The information dump or the sterile room syndrome
-
The consolidation wars
-
Management and maturity or decline into irrelevance
1. Early development by evangelists
The first website was rarely a management initiative. In fact, even today,
many senior managers have failed to engage properly with the Web. In the
early days, it was up to enthusiastic evangelists who built websites with
little support or budget. These people were visionaries, although they were
often seen as mavericks.
2. Rapid and enthusiastic growth
The evangelist kept spreading the word and convincing people of the merits
of the Web. Slowly, at first, they won converts. Then the momentum began to
grow. The growth became explosive within organizations where people could
take their own initiative. Websites were being built everywhere. It was an
exciting time. There was a genuine sense of an Internet community and being
part of something new.
3. The information dump or the sterile room
syndrome
If there's a book inside everyone, there's also a graphic designer. On the
intranet, in particular, you could find all sorts of stuff. From dancing
penguins, to opening and closing mailboxes, to winking eyes, websites became
experimental playgrounds. Huge quantities of content were unearthed and
shoveled online. Stuff was hard to find. Stuff was out-of-date. Stuff was
hard to read because of psychedelic wallpaper backgrounds.
Other websites demanded rigid central control from day one. A tiny team with
little or no resources was responsible for publishing everything. By the
time a lot of content got published, it was out-of-date. Everyone was
frustrated by this bottleneck approach that was strangling initiative.
4. The consolidation wars
Management realized that something was happening. The CEO decided to have a
look at the intranet one day. It was chaos. Something had to be done. IT had
a solution. Buy content management software. This would magic away all the
problems. The organizations that bought such software often found that it
made the problems worse, not better.
The better organizations realized that this was not an IT problem; it was a
publishing one. Communications became involved in managing the website, and
in writing content that actually worked on the Web. Design standards were
established. It was not easy. There were ongoing battles over fonts,
graphics, classification, navigation.
What happened in many organizations was that they managed to create a nice
standard design for the top level of the website. However, the further you
clicked downwards, the more the website diverged from the standard.
5. Management and maturity or decline into
irrelevance
The better websites have created overall standards and guiding principles
for their websites. However, they have also sought to decentralize
publishing authority to a local level, once standards are followed. Other
websites have become a bad joke. Some intranets, in particular, have become
a monumental waste of time. Overall, the best websites are getting better;
the worst ones are drifting into irrelevance.
Gerry McGovern

Related articles
Content management
Next issue: Web offers
new opportunities for communications manager
Previous issue:
Quality publishing is about saying no
New Thinking homepage
|
 |
"The McGovern Scorecard
enabled us to define, understand and focus on the needs of our customers -
content quality, content credibility, and content value."
Dr. J. David Galipeau, Head, Global Internet Strategy and Content Management for
Novartis.
More client feedback
Information on upcoming content management seminars and workshops
New Thinking Newsletter
Subscribe to this free weekly newsletter covering the role and function of content on the
Web.
More info |
Privacy policy
Read the current issue
The best websites are getting better; the worst
ones are drifting into irrelevance.
Selected clients








Find out more
about Gerry McGovern's clients
|