![]() |
|
|||
| Website content management | ||||
| Home I About I Services I Clients I Contact | ||||
|
|
||||
|
Subject Classification Reader Feedback Subscribing Unsubscribing 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
Content Critical
The Web
Content |
October 22, 2001 How free content has damaged the content industry By Gerry McGovern A recent report from Forrester Research states that people who use the Internet are reluctant to pay for content. However, a previous report by Forrester found that a majority of people thought that the quality of the content on the Internet was poor. People want quality content but they don’t want to pay for it. But that is a circle that cannot be squared. In understanding content on the Internet we need to recognize that there are two distinct types. First, there is content provided by traditional publishers whose very business model depends on generating revenue from this content. This they do through advertising revenue and/or subscription fees. The second type of content is that which supports an organization, either through helping to sell more products and/or enhance the brand of the organization. This is the most common type of content available online. The revenue that such content creates is indirect, and thus the publication of such content is not affected by an unwillingness of people to pay. However, the pervasive ‘content should be free’ attitude is undermining the very nature of content itself. Because content is being constantly associated with being free, a sense of content being cheap to publish, content being of little real value, is growing within business and society. The whole Napster saga very well illustrated this sort of undermining of the value of content. People who illegally swapped music files quickly claimed that it was their right. They claimed that the music industry was corrupt and that that made it okay for them to steal. Music groups who tried to prevent the stealing of their music were branded as greedy and anti-fan. Suddenly, music was meant to be free. As anyone who has ever been involved with content knows, creating quality content is a very expensive and time-consuming process. Content is never free to create and publish. The reasons why so much content has been free on the Internet up until now are as follows:
A product or service is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it. Right now,
people are fixed on the idea that Internet content should be free. We are thus caught
in a vicious circle. As long as people are not willing to pay, there will be a
continuous decline in the quality of much content that is found on the Internet.
|
|
New Thinking Newsletter Subscribe to this free weekly newsletter covering the role and function of content on the Web. More info | Privacy policy Read the current issue Content management seminar feedback "Gerry's presentation was very well received by the more than 400 higher education delegates. I've chaired this meeting since 1994 and very few speakers have generated the same level of enthusiasm. Wit and wisdom is always an unbeatable combination." Bob Johnson, American Marketing Association “Excellent presenter ... thought-provoking and relevant. I hope we can persuade him to visit us again one day.” Malcolm Davison The British Association of Communicators in Business "Hearing Gerry McGovern speaking, one can feel that he truly masters the subject of content management. He was voted ‘best speaker of the conference’ by delegates." Toon Lowette European Association of Directory Publishers Find out more about Gerry McGovern's seminars
As long as people are not willing to pay, there will be a continuous decline in the quality of much content that is found on the Internet.
"I've enjoyed New Thinking immensely because it
actually reflects intelligent thought. It is not simply a picture of facts. It is
challenging but not so that you need to be a hacker to understand it."
|
|
|
Home - About - Solutions - Clients - Contact - Search
|
||||